Roundup

How naturalism, not religion, can get in the way of science – just read it.

A little late for Memorial Day, but always worth showing — When a soldier comes home

Reverse racism is still racism – all voter intimidation is wrong.

When voter identification laws are illegal you know the country is on the road to ruin.  Welcome to Obama’s America, where common sense is now illegal. 

The work of Dr. Tiller’s hands — contains a link to a graphic site.  What a freak show.

A little of the side of Harvey Milk that Sean Penn and the MSM “forget” to show (Hat tip: Chester Street).  Some highlights:

Rather than the gentle, soft-spoken idealist portrayed by Sean Penn, the real Harvey Milk was a short-tempered demagogue who cynically invented stories of victimhood to advance his political career.

In the upside-down world of San Francisco politics, Milk curried favor with voters by boasting that his homosexuality had resulted in a dishonorable discharge from the Navy in the dark ages before the sexual revolution. But far from the in-your-face, ponytailed “Mayor of Castro Street” of the 1970s, Chief Petty Officer Milk of the 1950s was a closeted homosexual whose discharge papers reflected four years of honorable service.

What the film and legislation insinuate—in an effort to depict Milk as a martyr for the gay rights movement on par with Martin Luther King’s martyrdom for the Civil Rights movement—is that homophobia killed Harvey Milk on November 27, 1978.

But Harvey Milk’s homosexuality played about as much of a role in his murder as San Francisco mayor George Moscone’s heterosexuality played in his.

Read the link for Milk’s defenses of Jim Jones and how Milk helped send a 6 yr. old to his death.

Can same-sex marriage and religious liberty co-exist?  No.  Consider the examples in the link.

6 thoughts on “Roundup

  1. The Harvey Milk piece was quite enlightening, though not necessarily surprising. I linked to the entire article on which Mark’s post was based and ran a post about it at my blog.

    Your last bit is something that I’ve touched on repeatedly at my blog when the subject of homosexual rights comes up. I just can’t see how the imagined rights of the homosex movement can co-exist with the already Constitutionally codified rights of people to express their faith, speak freely and freely assemble. It’s pretty plain that it just won’t happen without those who oppose the agenda submitting as if in dhimmi-hood. That’ll be the day.

  2. Pingback: Is the presupposition of naturalism a science stopper? « Wintery Knight Blog

  3. Pingback: Can same-sex marriage and religious liberty co-exist? « Wintery Knight Blog

So, what do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s