Fact: There will be much more rationing of health care if Obama’s plans go through
—
It is hard to believe that the media is saying that Obama’s finance proposals are the first time in decades that regulations have countered free market solutions. Are they that ignorant of Sarbanes-Oxley, the requirements that cost public companies millions of dollars to implement? You know, the guidelines that were supposed to prevent things like the financial meltdown?
—
Obama fires Inspector General for investigating Democrat corruption — Where’s the outrage? I rarely watch the MSM on TV but caught a bit the other night. Was the announcer focused on scandals like this? No, he was mocking Fox News and showing videos of Obama criticizing Fox. Think about it: The MSM and Obama vs. Fox News. Wow.
And there’s more: This isn’t the only inspector fired or leashed.
—
The importance of Fathers and A Plea for Fathers — This should be a “duh” statement but with so many groups and the entertainment industry engaged in dad-bashing and downplaying their importance it is worth repeating. It is one of the consequences of pretending that same-sex parenting is benign.
—
Filed under: Weekly roundup | Tagged: current events, Father's day, fatherhood, fox news, inspector general, Politics, ration, religion, roundup, sarbanes-oxley
Hey Neil:
Sarb-Ox was window dressing. Got a lot of auditors work though…
Under Obamacare we have to ask some legitimate questions:
Will the politically appointed elite who now make your health care decisions for you… consider your campaign donations and political affiliations when making your health decisions?
Donate to Obama, vote for the Messiah, and you get approved. Didn’t vote the ‘correct’ way? Sorry, tough luck bud. Some may breathlessly declare “That will never happen in America!” and they may be right, but the mere POSSIBILITY that it could happen itself creates a chilling effect.
Did I offend? I feel like my question, rather, my request, was reasonable. I’d like you to please support this statement with something a little more substantial than a one-sentence hit and run:
It is one of the consequences of pretending that same-sex parenting is benign.
You do realize that most data these days suggests that gay parents are just as capable of raising children as straight parents, don’t you? That children raised by gay couples are no more likely to become gay than children raised by heterosexual ones? What is it about gays raising children that’s so toxic?
Fox, I’m on vacation and didn’t feel like proving yet again that the sky is blue. But to save you any more keystrokes for a few days I’ll reply.
Your “data” is the result of pro-gay propogandists and a media on life support.
By definition, gay parenting is unnatural.
Every survey showing the problems with the absence of a mother or father is evidence against your view.
You dissed the Bible in your other comment, but just because our secular society ignore it doesn’t change things. The Bible is the most true thing in the universe. God creates people through one man and one woman. Science supports that 100.000%. Biological parents, by DEFINITION are one man / one woman. Even with adoptions and such it doesn’t change the ideal of one man / one woman for child rearing.
What is so toxic about gay parenting, you ask? A deliberate absence of a mother or a father. 24×7x365 rebellion against God’s created order. Ever been to a gay pride parade or seen descriptions or images of them? And so on.
Give it a few days then try again.
Gay parenting is motherless/fatherless by design. So I don’t see how one can express concerns about fatherlessness while supporting gay parenting.
[...] Neil Simpson has a good article linked in his round-up about how single-payer health care will require that services be [...]