Despite the repeated lies from President Obama and Nancy Pelosi, Pelosi’s healthcare plan would directly fund abortion. Anyone surprised by that is beyond naive.
As I noted in Of course the health care bill includes abortion, if the bill didn’t have (barely) hidden abortion coverage, why wouldn’t pro-abortion groups be lobbying for its inclusion? This is the mother-of-all-health-care-bills and we’re to believe that these groups who live for unrestricted abortion rights are going to sit idly by and not have any coverage? They have always insisted that abortion is part of “reproductive health,” so why would they sit out this discussion and campaign so aggressively for the bill? I’m insulted that they expect us to believe that.
If it doesn’t cover abortions, then why was there opposition to an amendment to have abortions explicitly excluded?
The most amazing rationalization I heard for opposition to an anti-abortion amendment is that it would be redundant with the Hyde Amendment, which prevents federal funds from being used for abortions. Even if that claim were true (it isn’t — they have every plan to get rid of Hyde, which is renewed annually) it would be laughable. Consider their overall message: “The bill is 1,000+ pages and we haven’t even read it, but we are so compulsive that we couldn’t stand to have one paragraph with a redundant anti-abortion rule.”
Anyone believe that?
Do Liberals love abortion rights so much that they approve of these lies? The end justifies the means, eh? They aren’t pro-choice, they are pro-abortion.
Ironically, these “health care benefits” will increase the ratio of the abortions by minorities — as if the 3-1 rate of blacks destroyed by abortion over whites wasn’t bad enough.
The great irony is that abortion has done what the Klan only dreamed of.
- Dr. Alveda King, niece of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
Let’s encourage the Dems who have pledged to stand against funds for abortions.
Good idea. Anything to help offset the fake Christian pro-abortion freaks such as http://chuckcurrie.blogs.com/chuck_currie/2009/10/people-of-faith-should-support-health-care-reform.html . They ignore the Bible and mock God every day, then they puff up with Satanic pride about “taking care of the sick” with other people’s money — all the while blessing the crushing and dismemberment of innocent human beings — http://tinyurl.com/yzjq4lv .
Great speech from the man himself – The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. – after being awarded the Margaret Sanger Award by the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.
Alveda King’s views are far from Dr. King’s, the late Mrs. King, or the three King children.
Go read MLK’s words for yourself:
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/who-we-are/reverend-martin-luther-king-jr-4728.htm
Chuck, you have the history all wrong, as I’ll demonstrate in a moment. Either that, or you are lying again, but I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt here. Either way, having MLK expound on matters of sexual morality is about as meaningful as you preaching on hypocrisy and lying.
Here is what PP had to say about abortion just two years before giving that award to King ( http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j214/yodavater/PPPlanYourFamily63.jpg and http://tinyurl.com/ykeex9e ):
Chew on that while spreading the myth that King thought that crushing and dismembering black unborn human beings was a good thing. There were no scientific discoveries that made PP change their minds on abortion. It was all about the money, and winning over fake Christian leaders like Chuck who would bless abortions as being biblical, just as Sanger used black preachers to persuade their congregations to practice eugenics.
MLK wasn’t supporting the Planned Parenthood that made hundreds of millions off of baby killing in general and off of blacks in particular. If King knew about Sangers’ eugenics then it is bizarre that he’d accept an award in her name.
You can learn more about Sanger here — http://www.blackgenocide.org/sanger.html .
Liberals like Chuck must really hate blacks. How else can you explain it? The rate of abortions for blacks is 3x that of whites, yet Chuck and Co. don’t think that isn’t high enough. We need to give free abortions to them to make it grow. What do you want the ratio to be, Chuck? 10 times? 20? When will you stop?
I have a niece and a nephew who are black. They came from situations that cause Chuck & Co. to say, “Hurry up and destroy them.” Thank God that their mothers didn’t listen to Liberals and instead gave them up for adoption. They aren’t unwanted at all — just unwanted by anti-Christians like Chuck who want to make it easier to kill them.
[quote]Alveda King’s views are far from Dr. King’s, the late Mrs. King, or the three King children.[/quote]
And thank God for that.
And by God, I mean the one in the Bible. Not the one you claim to serve.
Well said!
I’m a little confused.
I’ve read a couple of posts about Martin Luther King denying the virgin birth and deity of the Lord Jesus Christ in a paper he wrote while in school. Can someone shed some light on these issues for me?
I’ve read some material on the net and also have seen clips of Coretta King defending homosexuality and abortion. I don’t need light shed on Coretta’s words. I’ve seen them and heard her myself on interviews. What she said was the same the other “supposed” black leaders (Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and others) are saying. They used to disagree with ,but now they agree with it. They used to disagree with homosexuality, but now they agree with it and believe that it needs or warrants certain human or civil rights, amendments or laws…..not mentioning being equated with black civil rights.
Neil et all,
http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/10/25/top_stories/doc4ae4b76d07e16766677720.txt
Turns out that whole “cervical cancer vaccine” thing?
Yeah, it doesn’t work.
Thanks for the update, LCB. Hadn’t seen that!
Pingback: Quote of the Day « The Pugnacious Irishman