Stan got me thinking about recent Supreme Court case about free speech and video games in his post about Free Speech. For the record, I’m certainly opposed to these violent video games.
Briefly, the story is that the Supreme Court has struck down a California law that made it a crime to sell violent video games to children. It wasn’t even a close vote. The court ruled 7:2. The court made a stunning decision: Make parents responsible for their children. Is there any doubt that our court system (and the nation that supports it) has lost its mind?
This comment will probably reveal that I’m not a lawyer, but doesn’t the 1st Amendment specifically say that “Congress shall make no law . . .” and not “the States . . .?'” Also, wouldn’t this get in the way of the 10th Amendment?
More importantly, I couldn’t help but laugh at some of the headlines noting that the responsibility to regulate this would now fall on parents. That’s one of the major problems of people looking to government to solve all their problems. The government solutions are usually counterproductive, but like drinking salt water the people just look to the government to solve even more problems.
This is just another example of the slippery slope of government intervention. Countless parents have come to expect the government to feed their kids multiple meals per day, even if it means wildly wasteful programs. But what could be a more basic responsibility of parents than to feed their kids?
Even though I thought the court’s view of this as a 1st Amendment issue was an overreach, I’m glad to see them err on that side. It may mean we’ll have just a little more time before any criticism of the LGBTQX agenda is considered illegal.