False teacher Chuck Currie* offers us a glimpse into how the President manipulates useful idiots into advancing his agenda in President Obama Will Announce Contraception Accommodation That Expands Coverage.
President Obama will speak at 9:15 am to announce an accommodation that expands contraception access for women and meets the needs of religious employers with objections to offering coverage. I’ve been briefed by senior White House officials and the plan is sound.
It has been obvious that much of what Chuck writes is simply a copy/paste job from Obama talking points, but I’m surprised he admitted it. He appeared to do that with the Giffords shooting, ghoulishly and falsely blaming Sarah Palin before the bodies were cold, and he does it regularly on whatever the latest topic is. I’m surprise he outed himself, though.
The parallels to the Nazis are so creepy: Fake Christians being mouthpieces for the culture-of-death government.
Religious employers will not be required to offer insurance plans that cover contraception. But those insurance companies will be required to provide free contraception to women.
A fact they never mention: This “contraception” includes abortifacients that kill human beings after fertilization.
Also not mentioned: Those sentences contradict each other and thus mean nothing. It is still a requirement of making employers pay the costs. Only in the fantasy world of Liberal economics is there such a thing as “free” health care. Let’s see: The insurance companies “have” to give “free” health care in the form of contraception, but they would never, ever make up the costs anywhere else, would they? Because that would mean the employers were still paying.
Fact: Either Chuck & Co. are failures at economics (that is what studies show) and/or they think you are an idiot. It really shows how much contempt they have for people who value life and freedom of religion, when all they did was repackage the same mandate into allegedly more flexible language.
Note how they can — and probably will — do the same thing with abortion funding (“You don’t have to pay for it, your insurer just has to give it for free. And they will gladly do so because it is cheaper than childbirth.”)
The religious angle is part of it, but I think what they are really trying to do is conflate contraception (very popular) with abortion (increasingly unpopular). They know they are losing the stand-alone battle on abortion, as young people (i.e., Roe v Wade survivors) are becoming more pro-life. But those same people want there to be access to birth control.
By merging the issues they think they have a better shot at winning the abortion battle. And they may be right. Like I say, Satan is evil but not stupid. The end game is taxpayer-funded abortions, because they truly believe that one of our problems is that people are killing enough innocent but unwanted human beings.
Insurance companies would prefer to offer free contraception than to cover the costs of an unwanted pregnancy or diseases that contraception can help prevent.
This is creative thinking by President Obama and his staff.
Really? Then why don’t those businesses do that already? Why does the government have to force them to do it?
Creative? Evil? Whatever. There is no right to health care. A right to health care would mean that someone else has a moral obligation to provide it.
And people can buy all the contraceptives they like. No one is proposing that they be illegal. The cries about “access” are simply lies.
And the disease reduction bit is nonsense. Graph the growth and Federal funding of Planned Parenthood and the exponential increase in STDs and don’t be surprised at the correlation. Condoms prevent some diseases, but give a false sense of security on others. And most other contraceptives increase the spread of disease because they perpetuate the sex-without-consequences fantasy.
Sister Carol Keehan, President of the US Catholic Health Association, and Planned Parenthood head Cecile Richards support the compromise.
The CEO of the largest baby killer in the country supports it?! That’s all I need to know. Read all about the founder of Planned Parenthood here, and how her dream of eliminating blacks and other “unfit” people is being fulfilled by people like Chuck and Cecile.
Many Christian denominations – the United Church of Christ included – strongly support contraception and have applauded the president’s efforts to expand coverage.
Many apostate denominations, that is. You know, the ones that think they don’t need religious freedoms because their views are indistinguishable from those of the world.
Any opposition to this new proposal will be partisan politics, pure and simple.
Wow, what an amazing preemptive rhetorical move! Now why doesn’t it ever occur to us to just start debates by saying that. We’d win every time, right?
Finally, note the hypocrisy in all this. Why aren’t the ACLU et al blasting religious people like Currie and Obama for forcing their religious views on others?
More on this at Jill Stanek’s blog
* Some views of the “reverend” Chuck Currie and nearly all other theological liberals:
- Jesus is not God (so he denies the Trinity).
- Jesus is not the only way to salvation.
- Jesus is pro-abortion, including partial-birth abortion and taxpayer-funded abortion.
- The original writings of the Bible were not inspired by God, but you should believe. that the Holy Spirit told him and the other Liberals in the UCC that God has changed his stance on marriage, parenting and homosexual behavior (now that’s blasphemy!). But it is still OK to quote any verses out of context if they seem to support your case for expanded government.
- Asking “Caesar” to take by threat of force from neighbor A to “give” to neighbor B counts as charity on your part and really pleases Jesus.
- It is acceptable to take 6 yr. old girls to gay pride parades.
- The book of John doesn’t belong in the Bible. Actually, most of the Bible doesn’t belong in the Bible.
- The Gospel of Thomas does belong in the Bible.
- It is more exciting to do sermons on Charles Darwin more than Jesus.
- It is acceptable to lie and libel people on blogs as long as you think you won’t get caught.
- It is acceptable to try to “out” commenters on public blogs as “haters” to their employers when they point out how bad your arguments are.
- Christians have as much to learn from other religions as they do from Christianity.
- and so much more!
But he’s totally a Christian, because he’s a “reverend!” And you know that because — unlike nearly every other reverend I see blogging — it is in his blog title and everything he writes. It is almost as if he thinks you wouldn’t “know” he’s a reverend if he didn’t keep reminding you . . .