“That’s roughly a four-fold increase in belief in ghosts and astrology, and a doubling of belief in tarot. Interesting, given that Richard Dawkins and other atheists think they are driving superstition away along with religious belief (they see the two as the same category, of course, which they are not).”
. . .
The US data in particular disconfirm skepticTM Michael Shermer’s claims altogether.
Many sources would point out that superstitions are often survivals of inchoate early religions, thus not likely to be welcomed by an ethical monotheist one.
But then new atheists may be more likely than other people to believe in space aliens.
But how can that be, when the “brights” have had a monopoly on education, politics and media for a century or so?
As a Christian, I scoff at superstitions. I leave those to non-believers.
Many Darwinists thought that DNA contained “junk,” and they used this “fact” as part of their mockery of Intelligent Design (ID). It turns out that DNA wasn’t junky after all — just as ID would have predicted. And these same Darwinists pretend that ID gets in the way of scientific progress.
Read this quote carefully. It is by Skeptic Magazine publisher Michael Shermer and it was written only 5 years ago.
We have to wonder why the Intelligent Designer added to our genome junk DNA, repeated copies of useless DNA, orphan genes, tandem repeats, and pseudogenes, none of which are involved directly in the making of a human being. In fact, of the entire human genome, it appears that only a tiny percentage is actively involved in useful protein production, It looks as though Rather than being intelligently designed, the human genome looks more and more like a mosaic of mutations, fragment copies, borrowed sequences, and discarded strings of DNA that were jerry-built over millions of years of evolution.
That is just another in a long line of evolutionary fairy tales. This false belief system dominates education, politics, science and fake Christian churches. Get informed and stop letting them get away with bad science.
Do you think their bias could be leading them to be wrong on anything else? Will Shermer et al apologize for hindering science with their false beliefs? Do they have any shame?