Pro-choice arguments by religious types, many of whom claim the name of Christ, are generally similar to those offered by pro-choicers. Nearly all of them ignore the innocent but unwanted human being destroyed by abortion. The difference with the religious types is that they insist that God is also pro-legalized, unrestricted abortion.
Here’s a prime example by a false teacher named Chuck Currie, who preaches at both UCC and UMC denominations: People Of Faith Must Defend Choice.
The title itself is a tipoff: As usual, pro-choicers can’t finish a sentence. A choice to do what? Where to go to college, whom to marry, what career to choose? Of course not. He means “People of faith must defend the choice to kill an innocent but unwanted human being.” Sounds different, doesn’t it?
Todd Akin’s recent comments about rape were reprehensible
Hey, that’s what Mitt Romney and countless other Republican leaders said! Welcome to the club.
- and so is the GOP platform, modeled after legislation put forth by Akin and Paul Ryan that would ban all abortions…even in the case of rape – but it is clear that Akin isn’t alone.
Just because Akin said one dumb thing doesn’t mean that we should stop trying to protect innocent but unwanted human beings from being destroyed.
Chuck goes on to insist that women can get pregnant from rape, which is what all of Akin’s critics concede. The irony is that Chuck was acting as if his side had a monopoly on science, when they are the ones who ignore the scientific fact that a new human being is created at fertilization.
And Chuck seemed oddly hostile to the children of rapists and fights aggressively for the right to kill them. I’d entertain the death penalty for the rapists, but I can’t see how that is just for their children.
Abortion is often used to hide the crimes of rape and incest. If they really care about rape, then they should protest Planned Parenthood and how they systematically hide statutory rape and sex trafficking.
The General Synod of the United Church of Christ has long maintained that:
Whereas, women and men must make decisions about unplanned or unwanted pregnancies that involve their physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being; and …
Note how they ignore the well-being of the unborn human being. Just because killing a human being appears to improve the well-being of another human being it still isn’t justified.
Whereas, abortion is a social justice issue, both for parents dealing with pregnancy and parenting under highly stressed circumstances, as well as for our society as a whole; …
That sentence is gibberish. First, it doesn’t define “social justice.” Did the government give unwanted artificial insemination to these women? What injustice made people have sex? Being relatively poor compared to those in your country (not to mention being simultaneously very wealthy compared to the rest of the planet) is not an excuse to kill unwanted human beings.
And what could more unjust than destroying an innocent human being merely because she is unwanted?
Does parenting under “highly stressed circumstances” justify killing children outside the womb? Of course not. So why is it valid inside the womb?
Therefore, be it resolved, that the Sixteenth General Synod:
affirms the sacredness of all life, and the need to protect and defend human life in particular;
That is the biggest and most disingenuous lie of all. Again, it is a scientific fact that the unborn are unique, living human beings from fertilization, so under no circumstances can they claim to “affirm the sacredness of all life” while justifying the destruction of over 3,000 lives in the U.S. each day.
Worse yet, these people advocate for taxpayer-funded abortions, which means they think that one of our problems is that there aren’t enough unwanted human beings destroyed each day. And they claim Jesus is on their side!
encourages persons facing unplanned pregnancies to consider giving birth and parenting the child, or releasing the child for adoption, before abortion;
That is where they talk in circles. They want to act as if abortion is sort of bad — not bad enough to be illegal, but bad enough to want to consider other options. But if it doesn’t kill innocent human beings, why would they prefer other options?
upholds the right of men and women to have access to adequately funded family planning services,
Watch out for their deadly euphemisms like “family planning” services. If you are pregnant, then that human being is part of your family. Killing her doesn’t change that.
and to safe, legal abortions as one option among others; . . . People of faith must stand up and defend a woman’s right to make her own health care decisions.
Another deadly phrase: “health care decisions.” That is right up there with “reproductive rights,” but remember that abortion kills a human being that has been reproduced.
It shouldn’t be left up to Todd Akin, Paul Ryan or other politicans.
The lives of the unborn shouldn’t be left up to fake Christians like Chuck, President Obama, Nancy Pelosi, etc.
It is morbidly ironic that Chuck’s most frequently quoted verse is from Matthew 25: “Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me.” Yet he opposes any restrictions to abortions and thinks we need more of them via taxpayer-funding.
Finally, consider how this is one of the rare topics where Liberals don’t play the race card (there is a recent notable exception that I’ll post about separately). Why is that? Perhaps because the abortion rate for blacks is three times that of whites, and for Hispanics it is two times that of whites. And they know that taxpayer-funded abortions would increase those rates. Actively supporting policies that kill minorities at such incredibly higher rates seems kinda . . . I don’t know . . . racist.
Jesus is the author of life (Acts 3:15). False teachers like Chuck deny the divinity of Jesus (and therefore the Trinity), the exclusivity of Jesus (He is the only way to salvation and they teach the opposite), the authority and accuracy of scripture, and so much more. Their position on abortion is just one more example of them being wolves in sheep’s clothing.
People of real faith should be anti-abortion.