Ray Comfort’s new video, Evolution vs. God, will be available for free in a few weeks. You can download it now for $20. I went ahead and did so and it was fantastic. He had a fabulous presentation of the law and the Gospel. And he tied countless scientists, including PZ Myers, in knots. Myers and Richard Dawkins are in full personal attack mode and, oddly enough, helping draw attention to the movie. So thanks for that, guys!
The Doctrine of the Trinity: No Christianity Without It — a superb overview of the Trinity — read and enjoy!
This is great news: Congressional investigation of Planned Parenthood: What to expect
Abortion proponent “thrilled” by an abortion on “Grey’s Anatomy” — great analysis of the moral schizophrenia of the pro-abortion movement.
One of many problems abortion proponents have is sending mixed messages about getting one. Whether to act glib and risk offending normal sensibilities, or to act serious and risk humanizing the baby, that is the question.
. . .
And then the abortion. It ends up only looking sick and pathetic for a father to go so far as to willingly watch the baby he loves and wants being killed, all to support that child’s mother. And why all the drama if it isn’t human children being killed by abortion?
Scott Klusendorf is one of the world’s best pro-life apologists. He had a good analysis of Ray Comfort’s 180 movie (go watch it if you haven’t yet). You can only put so much in a 30 minute movie, so here are some things to be aware of if people have questions about the movie. (Scott had lots of good things to say as well. I just included the critiques here.)
My concern: The film overlooked some important distinctions:
1) The distinction between people in the film (Venice Beach?) and the public at large—The sample used in the film is not only small; it’s not where most people are in terms of historical knowledge. . . .
2) The distinction between shouting a conclusion and establishing one–A sharp abortion-choicer could easily say, “Ya, I value human life. What Hitler did to Jews was wrong, but the unborn are not valuable human beings, so the comparison fails.” To succeed, pro-lifers must first establish that the unborn are indeed human (which the film does through images rather than scientific evidence), but then show that none of the differences between the embryos we once were and the adults we are today justify killing us at that earlier stage of development. Differences of size, level of development, environment, and degree of dependency, are not value giving in the way that abortion-advocates need them to be in order to make their case. In short, jumping from killing Jews for bad reasons to killing the unborn for those same reasons leaves out important premises in the pro-life argument.
3) The distinction between killing a “baby” and unjustly killing human beings—Perhaps I am nitpicking here, but I think Comfort asks the wrong question when he points to a 6-week fetus and says, “Doesn’t that look like a baby?” What if the critic says “no?” End of discussion. . . .
4) The distinction between voting for pro-life candidates and voting pro-life–Put simply, what does it really mean to vote pro-life? . . .
5) The distinction between intentional killing and killing that is merely foreseen–Is it always wrong to kill an innocent human being? What about ectopic pregnancy? . . .
Despite these concerns, the film is worth seeing and Comfort gets huge accolades for his courage in confronting abortion head-on. Say what you want, at least he’s doing something about it and for that I am immensely grateful. Before ripping him, his evangelical critics need to ask themselves what they are doing to stop the bloodshed. Are they taking this holocaust as seriously as Comfort does? I can only pray that one day they will.
The dealth penalty and deterrence: what the research shows — contrary to myths, the death penalty is a deterrent. The question is whether it is appropriate as a deterrent (I think it is). After all, capital punishment for speeding would be a deterrent, but perhaps over the top.
Random thought about evolution by Glenn — good stuff! My favorite, which the Darwinists typically gloss over or ignore:
DNA can only be produced with the help of at least 20 different types of protiens. But these proteins can only be produced at the direction of DNA. Since each requires the other, a satisfactory explanation for the origin of one must also explain the origin of the other. Apparently, this entire manufacturing system came into existence simultaneously. This implies Creation. (Walter T. Brown, Jr., In the Beginning, p.6)
San Francisco Values: White ‘Master,’ Black ‘Slave’ Adorn Cover of Folsom Street Fair 2011 Program Guide — This goes on in Nancy Pelosi’s district. The police do nothing to stop it. The Left doesn’t protest it.
Homosexual activists Dan Savage and Lady Gaga should be brought up on charges of murder for issuing wholesale false promises and lies to young people confused about their sexuality.
Please watch this, then share it, then considering using this approach yourself.
In 33 minutes it covers a lot of important ground in a powerful way. It shows how people are often ignorant of history (Adolph Hitler and the Holocaust) and how carefully framing what abortion really does can quickly change hearts and minds. There is also an excellent example of how to share the Gospel with people in a simple, compelling and accurate way.
WARNING: Viewer discretion advised — not for little ones.
Kudos to Ray Comfort and all those who put this together. It is very well done.
While seeking to give an example of the design of the universe, evangelist Ray Comfort mistakenly claimed that bananas were always in their current form. He later apologized, formally and publicly.
But many of the New Atheists can’t overlook this apparently unforgivable mistake. One atheistic site crowed as follows:
The “original” banana was short and stubby and filled with large, hard seeds. It didn’t “fit perfectly in the human hand” and it wasn’t easy to eat. The reason we have the much friendlier bananas of today is that humans cultivated bananas and selectively bred them to the now so familiar form.
That was amusing on a couple levels. First, he points to the Intelligent Design of the current bananas. Gotta love that. Second, he acts like it was common knowledge. Go give polygraphs to all the New Atheists mocking Ray Comfort and see how many knew about the history of the banana. I’d guess that 99% of them had no idea.
And even if they did know, they are deliberately missing the larger point. Ray was demonstrating the obvious design of the universe. He picked a bad example then apologized for it clearly and publicly. He showed 100 times the class of the New Atheists and demonstrated his integrity at the same time. But that doesn’t mean that there isn’t a wealth of legitimate evidence to point to.
Oddly, these same atheists are quick to rationalize away the nearly century-long, willfully perpetrated fraud related to Haeckel’s embryos, not to mention other frauds.
Ray Comfort has a terrific site here. He preaches the Gospel well and isn’t afraid to mention the very real existence of Hell.
Does Mormonism teach that Adam was God (or a God)? Yes, and here is some of the evidence. Don’t let them tell you otherwise.
What really caused Michael Jackson to die? (Ray Comfort) — Good video at Christocentric
Human rights groups in South Korea say North Korea has stepped up executions of Christians, some of them in public.
The communist country, the world’s most closed society, views religion as a major threat….
…[J]ust owning a Bible in North Korea may be a cause for torture and disappearance.
From Stand to Resaon:
A new scanning technique allows life-size models to be made of unborn babies allowing the mothers to see their child in a realistic way.
Very cool. These make a huge difference to abortion vulnerable women. I’m on the board of a CareNet Pregnancy Center and just this week was reminded of the importance of ultrasounds as well.
One of the volunteers described a woman who just visited the center with her newborn son. She originally had an abortion scheduled but came to CareNet the day before that and got an ultrasound. The technician couldn’t find the baby at first but gave it one last try and showed him to the mother. Her reply was a common one: “I realized I couldn’t kill my baby.”
Ultrasounds save lives.
Read Stephen C. Meyer’s new book, Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design (HarperOne). He lays out a massive evidentiary case. As a philosopher of science, he also explains what science is. If you really want to tell me there’s no positive scientific evidence that biological information coded in DNA reflects purposeful design, then go ahead and read Meyer’s book and report back to me your reasoned response.
Feel free to leave your comments there, not here.
Someone had to say it: OK, Enough! Cronkite Was NOT That Great . Side note: I thought he was already dead, so it would have been more newsworthy to me if they had announced the previous day that he was still alive.